So my perspective, I will have to grant is different than the authors. The others who use “dangerous cult” are the judgmental types who believe if you don’t believe as they believe on religious issues you will be lost, as if their ideas dictate who God saves or loses. Most people who use the term “dangerous cult” are speaking about a cult that ingests poison or separates by mind control family members. From my perspective if you write a book it should be of factual use to any reader, not made to appeal to a certain reader who already believes a particular point of view. So far most of my complaints have been about factual errors. She says to him, “What I am reading of your complaints against the book are legitimate if the book was written to convince a loyal Adventist reader.” Teresa defends against Ron’s criticisms by saying the book isn’t for current Adventists or even non-Adventists, but is intended for former Adventists to give them “historically accurate information” they didn’t get from the Adventist church. Falsifies Ellen White’s self-understanding.Inaccurate depiction of the development of the Adventist sanctuary teaching.False depiction of Millerism, colored by their animosity.White Published Writings website” that is actually from an anti-Ellen White webpage. Slopping and inadequate footnoting (including attributing something to “Ellen G.A lack of objectivity, and a clear animus against Adventism. ![]() Let me first summarize Ron’s main points of criticism, since that’s how this conversation started: Teresa commented on February 21 that she thought Corson was unfair, and offered to send me a copy. Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on The Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine.On February 1, 2009, I linked to Ron Corson’s review of Theresa and Arthur Beem’s book, It’s Okay NOT to Be a Seventh-day Adventist. It will also help decrease the knowledge translation window down from an average of ten years. It will allow other emergency providers to learn from your intellectual efforts. This is in keeping with the spirit of the FOAMed movement. The only other thing we ask is that you share the information freely with anyone else. We are very proud of what we have produced and it’s nice to get credit for our hard work. The first is not to alter the BEEM Critical Appraisal Tools. We provide these for free hoping you will use your own knowledge, skills and expertise to perform your own appraisals. These tools can also be used for small group learning sessions or Journal Clubs. You will now have a step-by-step EBM instructions to critically assess the literature. In keeping with the Free Open Access to Medical Education ( FOAMed) movement we want to share these tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |